A government analysis shows the nation's waterways are awash
in traces of chemicals used in beauty aids, medications,
cleaners, and foods. Among the substances: caffeine,
contraceptives, painkillers, insect repellent, perfumes, and
nicotine.
Scientists say the problem is that these substances largely
escape regulation and defy municipal wastewater treatment.
And the long-term effects of exposure are unclear, they say.
The compounds are sold on supermarket shelves and found in
virtually every medicine cabinet and broom closet as well as
at farms and factories. And they are flushed or rinsed down
the drain every day. But they do not disappear, researchers
warn.
Hydrologists with the U.S. Geologic Survey tested water
samples in 30 states for 95 common compounds, an emerging
class of contaminants known as pharmaceutical and personal
care pollutants (PPCPs). The results of the three-year
analysis appear in the March 15 issue of the journal
Environmental Science and Technology. The scientists
found that the chemicals persist in the environment in
concentrations as low as one part per billion or less. The
results mirror similar studies of PPCPs in Europe and
Canada.
Yet little is known about PPCPs' potential health and
environmental effects. The use and disposal of 81 of the 95
compounds in the study are entirely unregulated, officials
said. "Compounds that we use in households or even consume
can persist though watewater treatment and affect resources
on a pretty broad scale," said Herb Buxton, USGS coordinator
of the USGS toxic substances hydrology program.
For example, many scientists suspect the widespread use of
antibacterial agents in human medicines, household cleaners,
and veterinary medicines has encouraged the development of
germs that are resistant to antibiotics. The USGS study
found at least 31 antibiotics and antibacterial compounds in
water samples.
The study also tallied traces of at least 11 compounds
linked to birth control and hormone supplements. Some
studies have linked environmental exposure to hormones to
deformed sex organs in wildlife, sex reversal in some fish,
and declining fertility in humans, as well as cancers and
other diseases.
Scientists who did not participate in the USGS survey said
PPCPs represent the "next big unknown" in environmental
contamination.
Exposure to even tiny amounts may result in cumulative
risks, they said, especially when the compounds combine in
unanticipated ways. "You don't need therapeutic doses of a
drug to have an effect," said Christian Daughton of the
Environmental Protection Agency's exposure research
laboratory in Las Vegas. "Some organisms have potential to
suffer multigenerational exposures. Parts per billion could
have profound effects."
Industry and water utility officials said they expect the
EPA to decide in the next few years how to regulate PPCPs.
They said promising new wastewater treatment technologies
can break down many of the chemicals using biological
methods or even exposure to ultraviolet light.
"We're not ignoring it," said Alan Roberson, regulatory
affairs director for the American Water Works Association in
Washington. "One question is what do you do with the
concentrated form of these chemical compounds if you take
them of the water?"
In 1999-2000, USGS scientists collected samples downstream
from cities, farms, and factories. Many of the waterways
contribute to municipal water supplies. They included the
Sacramento River at Freeport, Calif.; the South Platte River
in Denver; the Mississippi River above Minneapolis/St. Paul;
and the Charles River in Boston. Seven or more chemicals
were found in half of the streams sampled.
In addition to caffeine, the USGS reported the most
frequently detected compounds were coprostanol and
cholesterol, which are byproducts of digestion. Also found
frequently was DEET, a common insect repellent. Among the
medications found were the blood thinner Warfarin,
antidepressants, and blood-pressure medicine.